特斯拉NACS插頭有什麼優勢？

與美國大多數非特斯拉電動車和充電站使用的組合充電系統（CCS）標準相比，特斯拉的 NACS 插頭設計有哪些優勢？

NACS插頭的設計更優雅。是的，它更小並且更容易使用。 Yes, the CCS adapter is bulky for seemingly no particular reason. That is really no surprise. Tesla's design was created by one company, working independently VS. a design-by-committee approach. Standards are usually designed by a committee, with all of the compromises and politics involved. I am not an electrical engineer, so I can't speak to the technology involved. But I do have a lot of work experience with both North America and International standards. The end result of the process is generally good, but it is often painful and slow to get there.

Would it be better if we settled on one standard for the entire world?絕對地。 Since Europe has settled on CCS, that global standard should be CCS. But there isn't a lot of incentive for Tesla to change to CCS in the US, given that its own technology is better and it is the market leader. Customers of other EV makers (myself included) have made it very clear that they are unhappy with the quality of charging options available to them. Given that, the choice to adopt NACS is a very easy one.